Comments on Spivak's Book
No book is perfect, and our excellent textbook is no exception. This
page will grow to be a list of typos and other mistakes (mostly very
minor) in Spivak's ``Calculus'' book (third edition). If you find
anything, please let me know (electronic means preferred!), and I'll
add your report. At the end of the year I plan to send this page to
Spivak.
I should have started this two years ago, when I first taught using
this book. I guess the few typos reported to me before October 2004 may
be lost.
The format of the entries below is: (page number; date added to this
list (d/m/y); credit; report).
- 49; 7/10/04; Gary
Baumgartner; at the beginning of the third line of question 6,
``
'' should be ``
''.
- 171; 29/11/04; Roman Feiman and Jordan Myslik; on line 9,
``
'' should be ``
''.
- 181; 8/11/04; Shay Fuchs; in problem 9, ``
'' should
be ``
''.
- 260; 14/12/04; Richard Michael; on line
, a factor of
is
missing in the formula for
.
- 267; 14/12/04; Richard Michael; on line 9, ``new function
''
should be ``new function
''.
- 321; 18/10/04; Dror Bar-Natan; the treatment of
the irrationality of
is horrible. Should have been done after
integration by parts, along the lines of
http://www.math.toronto.edu/~drorbn/classes/0203/157AnalysisI/etc/PiIrrational.html.
- 350; 18/02/05; Keh-Harng Feng and Jordan Myslik; in exercise 7c,
``
'' should be ``
''.
- 370; 5/4/05; Jordan Myslik; in line 8, replace ``
''
with ``
''.
- 431; 7/03/05; Dror Bar-Natan; in exercise 16 part
(d), replace
with
.
- 614; 18/10/04; Yan, Hao; in the solution of 7(a), should be
.
- 618; 10/11/04; Yan, Hao; in the solution of 1(v), ``
''
should be ``
''.
- 647; 5/4/05; Jordan Myslik; the solution to 8(iii) is
(not
).
The generation of this document was assisted by
LATEX2HTML.
Dror Bar-Natan
2005-04-05