| Dror Bar-Natan: Classes: 2002-03: Math 157 - Analysis I: | (113) | Next: Homework Assignment 11 Previous: Class Notes for the Week of November 11 (9 of 9) | 
We are skipping the appendix on convexity of Spivak's Chapter 11, but it is still worthwhile to take something from it (without proof):
|  |  | 
Theorem.  The following are equivalent, for a function  defined on some interval
defined on some interval  (assuming
 (assuming  is such that these statements make
sense):
 is such that these statements make
sense):
 are above the graph of
 are above the graph of  .
.
 and every
 and every  ,
,
  
 
 all lie below that graph and touch
  it just at the points of tangency.
 all lie below that graph and touch
  it just at the points of tangency.
 is increasing.
 is increasing.
 is positive on
 is positive on  :
:
  
 .
  (Gary Baumgartner makes the
  following correction: This last statement implies all others, but it
  isn't implied by the others as can be seen by looking for example at
.
  (Gary Baumgartner makes the
  following correction: This last statement implies all others, but it
  isn't implied by the others as can be seen by looking for example at
   . If all sharp inequalities in this handout are replaced by
  non-sharp ones (i.e., replace
. If all sharp inequalities in this handout are replaced by
  non-sharp ones (i.e., replace  by
 by  and
 and  by
 by  everywhere,
  with similar corrections for verbal statements),
  then this statement becomes equivalent to all others).
 everywhere,
  with similar corrections for verbal statements),
  then this statement becomes equivalent to all others).
If any of these statements holds, we say that `` is convex''. There is a
similar theorem with all inequalities reversed, and then the name is ``
 is convex''. There is a
similar theorem with all inequalities reversed, and then the name is `` is concave''.
is concave''.