**Question Corner and Discussion Area**

Can you give one example of a directly measurable quantity which has an imaginary number in it? In all cases I've seen you either ignore the imaginary root or square it into a real quantity.For your first question, here are some examples (see also the "answers and explanations" section of the web site, as well as an earlier question in the Question Corner area):Second, don't imarginary numbers arise because we ask that multiplication is communitive, i.e.

A×B=B×A, but if we dropped this rule, and defined multiplication as 1 × 1=1, -1 × -1=-1, -1 × 1=-1, 1 × -1=1, then I believe we would lose the imaginary terms, but be stuck with a messier (similar to operator algebra) mathematics.

- The strength of an electromagnetic field. This is a directly measurable quantity that is measured by a complex number. That number will be purely real if the field is all electric with no magnetic component, purely imaginary if the field is all magnetic with no electric component, and in other cases will have a non-zero real part and a non-zero imaginary part.
- An attenuating medium placed in the path of an electromagnetic
wave is also measured by a complex number. The number will be purely
real if the medium affects the magnitude of the wave but leaves the phase
unchanged, and purely imaginary if the medium shifts the phase by 90 degrees.
In general, a medium which scales the magnitude by a factor of
*R*and shifts the phase by an angle*t*is described by the complex number .A field

*F*that enters medium*M*will emerge as*F*times*M*(where this product is by the laws of complex multiplication). It is this fact that justifies measuring the entire field by a single complex number rather than taking its electric and magnetic components separately and measuring each by a real number, for in the latter case you wouldn't have a way to multiply. - The state of a component in an electronic circuit is also measured by a complex number. That number will be purely real if there is a voltage across it but no current flowing through it (such as a fully charged capacitor) and purely imaginary if there is current flowing through it but no voltage across it (such as a fully discharged capacitor).
- An LC filter in an electric circuit can be measured by a complex number, and the theory is much the same as for an attenuating medium placed in the path of an electromagnetic field.

As for your second question: commutativity is not the issue. More important is the fact that multiplication has to be related to addition by the distributive law.

There are plenty of non-commutative extensions of the reals (such as the quaternions), but any that satisfy the distributive law and are complete with respect to root-taking must of necessity contain the complex numbers as a subset.

Your example is simply a function from pairs of real numbers to real numbers
for which there happens to exist a "root" *r* of -1 in the sense
that *f*(*r*,*r*)=-1. There are plenty of such functions, but unless they
are linear and distribute over addition, they don't provide the
structure needed for a notion of "multiplication".

For instance, in your example you would have 1 × (1 + (-1)) = 1 × 0 = 0, but (1 × 1) + (1 × (-1) = 1 + 1 = 2.

Non-commutative multiplication is messier but still useful, but an operation that is not commutative, not associative, and doesn't distribute over addition cannot really play the part of multiplication in any reasonable mathematical theory.

This part of the site maintained by (No Current Maintainers)

Last updated: April 19, 1999

Original Web Site Creator / Mathematical Content Developer: Philip Spencer

Current Network Coordinator and Contact Person: Joel Chan - mathnet@math.toronto.edu

Go backward to Complex Numbers in Real Life

Go up to Question Corner Index

Go forward to Geometry and Imaginary Numbers

Switch to text-only version (no graphics)

Access printed version in PostScript format (requires PostScript printer)

Go to University of Toronto Mathematics Network
Home Page