Go backward to This is Not the Fallacy

Go up to 1=2: A Proof using Complex Numbers

Switch to graphical version (better pictures & formulas)

Go to University of Toronto Mathematics Network Home Page

Of course, we all know that 1=2, but the fallacy is not in this final
step; the final step *does* follow from the previous one.

Therefore, the mistake must have occurred earlier on in the proof.

Why don't you go back to the list of steps in the proof and see if you can identify which one is wrong, now that you know it isn't this one?

This page last updated: May 26, 1998

Original Web Site Creator / Mathematical Content Developer: Philip Spencer

Current Network Coordinator and Contact Person: Joel Chan - mathnet@math.toronto.edu

Navigation Panel: Previous | Up | Graphical Version | U of T Math Network Home