**Answers and Explanations**

Mathematical objects do not exist in the same sense that a physical object exists; nobody has ever bumped their elbow on a number, for instance.

Instead, mathematical objects are abstract concepts (often abstracted from a real world situation, by isolating just the part of the situation that is relevant for a particular discussion).

When we ask whether or not a mathematical object exists, we must have in mind an appropriate context: a particular, precisely defined collection of concepts. Then we ask, "among these concepts, is there one which matches the object we are looking for?" If so, we say that the object exists; if not, it doesn't exist.

For example, the *natural numbers* (that is, the numbers
1, 2, 3, 4, and so on) are the concepts obtained by abstracting the
property of "size" from collections of objects. The number 2 is
the abstract concept that expresses what the following
collections of objects have in common: the eyes on a person's face,
the occurrences of the letter "b" in the word "bib",
the wheels on a bicycle, and so on.

If we were to ask "does there exist a natural number between 1 and 2",
we mean, "among the collection of natural numbers, is there one (say
*x*) such that 1 < *x *< 2?" The answer to this question
is "No". You cannot, for example, go to the beach and pick up more than
one pebble but fewer than two pebbles.

If we were to ask "does there exist a number between 1 and 2",
the answer would depend on what
we meant by the word *number*.

If we were using the word "number" to mean "natural number" (that is, measurement of the size of a set), then the answer would be "No; no such number exists."

However, there are other contexts in which the answer might be
"Yes". For example,
we might be in a context where *number* is
meant to refer, not to a natural number,
but to a *rational number*: that is, a fraction.

Rational numbers are something quite different from natural numbers:
instead of being measurements of sizes of sets, they are *ratios*
of the sizes of two sets. For example, the fraction 3/4 is expressing
the ratio "3 to 4".

In this context, where *number* refers to a ratio not to
the size of a single set, and where
"2" and "1" really mean the fractions "2/1" and "3/1"
respectively, then the answer to our question is
"yes":
there does exist a number between 1 and 2, for instance the fraction 3/2.

This illustrates that, before one can say whether a concept exists or not, we have to be quite clear about the context in which the question is being asked.

If you are still puzzled by this, you might want to read more (in a discussion of whether or not "imaginary numbers" exist) about how there are many quite different meanings for the word "number", and how whether or not a concept exists can depend on the meaning you have in mind.

This page last updated: September 1, 1997

Original Web Site Creator / Mathematical Content Developer: Philip Spencer

Current Network Coordinator and Contact Person: Any Wilk - mathnet@math.toronto.edu

Go backward to Does the Number e Have Special Meaning?

Go up to Answers and Explanations -- Index

Go forward to Number Systems with Different Kinds of Numbers

Switch to text-only version (no graphics)

Access printed version in PostScript format (requires PostScript printer)

Go to University of Toronto Mathematics Network
Home Page